The Scarabeos 2001 Project - Save Your BeOS!Why We Are HereWe, a group of BeOS shareholders, have formed the Scarabeos 2001 project in the belief that
What We WantThe "Scarabeos2001/openBeOS-openBeIA-Committee" wants to put BeOS/BeIA under a GPL-oriented licence, if Palm Inc./Be Inc. don't release BeOS under an open-source licence. (Like Sun Microsystems did with "StarOffice" and Netscape with their web browser).Because Be Inc. CEO Jean-Louis Gassée and the other remaining "big" shareholders keep only 20% out of the total amount of shares, the chances to stop the Palm Inc./Be Inc. deal seem to be very good. 80% of the shares are being hold by the BeOS-fans everywhere. There is no other perspective for BeOS: Be Inc. has no money left and it won't be able to sell this product during the economic crisis. BeIA is a beautiful operating system, but it was also a huge mistake. We believe in BeOS and we are absolutely sure that Palm will not continue to support our OS. So our GPL-like licence is the only remaining possibility. How You Can Help
What you will find further down this page:
Background InformationThe End?On August, 16th, the Be Inc. managing board sold all developed products for 11 Million $ in shares to Palm Inc. The development of these excellent products used up more than 100 Million $. According to insider information, however, Palm will neither keep up the development of the operating systems BeOS and BeIA, nor will they issue them under an Open Source license to the interested public.The shareholders get an even rougher end of this deal: not only has
the stock market price of Be Inc. shares dropped for almost 99% since the
IPO, but also is the contract not legally binding, since the shareholders
haven't approved of it yet. Thus the shares haven't been sold and their
value has dropped by 33% again since August, 16.
The AlternativeMedia and informed insiders had been hinting that upcoming versions of Be's products would finally live up to long-standing expectations. BeIA was in production (eVilla by Sony). Palm however is only interested in the human capital of Be. BeIA might be a potential competitor for them. Furthermore do recent advancements by Microsoft like much enhanced versions of WinCE or embedded WinXP mean even more trouble for Palm. Palm doesn't want to end up like another Netscape. Knowing the potential, we ask: Wouldn't an OpenBeOS be the last chance?The DangerSo far the future of Gobe Productive 3.0 isn't clear, it would be bad if it was the last version. StarOffice 6.0, Opera 5 and others have been postponed because of the missing BONE technology and the overall uncertain future. More and more companies are abandoning BeOS, especially in the games sector. Are we doomed to roam the surface of this planet in disarray, living of the dreams of a glorious past and mourning our loss loudly (hi, Amiga users ;-))? We say: NO!Why Stopping The Deal?Kill the deal so that BeOS/BeIA might live! We shareholders, some having lost thousands of Dollars, don't need to worry about the remaining Cents.Imagine this: You have 100 shares which add up to some 12$. Given the selling fees, you are left with 4$. Having lost several hundreds of Dollars, does it really matter anymore if you get those 4$? Wouldn't it be more useful for you if you could 'donate' these in order to keep on using the world's best operating system? (And thus providing MS with some headaches for their unfair fight against BeOS, Linux, OS/2?) What's the alternative? Be Inc. is - for all practical matters - broke.
Be's employees will be taken over by Palm in any case, if the deal is done
or not, no doubt about it. They have done tremendous work, too
good to be out of a job. But that topic has been done away with.
BeOS and BeIA, having been cleansed of proprietary third party code, will be issued under a modified GPL (similar to Linux). We don't see any danger of other operating systems or companies 'borrowing' from the code: Linux - an interesting project, but not our cup of tea - is too different, but will profit from an OpenBeOS like OpenBeOS will profit from the cooperation of many Linux users and developers. You are welcome! Bill Gates won't use BeOS-Code for Windows, he sure doesn't want to have to put Windows on the 'Net for free. License QuestionsDifferences Between The GPL And Our Proposed OpenBeOS LicenseThe name BeOS/BeIA will be reserved to distributions which had their kernel and other essential parts of their operating system certified. Certification will be done by Be Inc. or another future organization. This process is similar to the Linux kernel development, where Linus Torvalds decides what will be included. Distribution of uncertified modifications is allowed, but not under a name which suggests a connection with BeOS.Commercial distributors are obliged to pay a small amount of licensing
fees per manufactured CD box to Be Inc. For example: Company A and company
B distribute a BeOS/BeIA box for end users, A distributes 10.000 and B
5.000. A pays Be Inc. (more of a foundation, then) 10.000$ licensing fees,
B pays 5.000$. The BeOS user may download OpenBeOS from the servers of
those companies, only paying the connection costs, and use this downloaded
version for free, whether for personal or for commercial purposes. The
companies won't have to pay licensing fees for these downloaded distributions.
Taking into account the difficult situation many developer teams and
new BeOS companies will face, it will not be allowed to download BeOS/BeIA,
burn it onto a CD and sell these CDs. Same goes for magazine CDs,
with the exception of explicit permission by the distributors.
Why A GPL-like License?Keeping Be Inc. alive? But ... currently you do not get any venture capital and there's no money in the stock markets, either. Recall the last week with tech stocks plummeting. Be Inc. still has 50 employees, and you'd probably need more, but those people had to be paid. The distribution agreements with Koch Media, Apacabar, Gobe etc. are not cost-effective. People on the street either want a free Personal Edition (PE) or a perfect NT/2000/XP replacement. Furthermore the fact that Adobe, Macromedia, Quark and others don't want to port their products (under current circumstances) does not leave room for alternatives.One might issue a (commercial) PE 5.1 with less features, but with the intent to keep the interest and the development efforts alive and then fork a 'pro' edition with 6.0 - having a free BeOS 'for the masses' and some sort of commercial NT replacement - but Be Inc. can't possibly support two lines of development. And nobody would buy a 'Pro'-Edition when there's an almost identical PE available for free on the 'Net. It's very easy: There are no alternatives to the modified GPL model. None other than the demise of BeOS, that is ... The modified GPL allows developers to write their own proprietary and
/ or commercial applications or port applications from other platforms.
It's up to the developer to decide if he wants to charge distributors for
distributing CDs with his work.
Organizing The Share CollectionBe Inc. shares are mostly held by small shareholders, just 20% are in the hands of the managing board or institutional investors. Intel and all the other 'Big Shots' have already left the boat, Palm has no shares since it doesn't want the company, but it's human capital. The managing board isn't to blame for the sell-out. They had no choice. But the shareholders of course have all the right in the world to renounce Palm's alms. All the more since Be Inc. is free of debts, after all.We, a large number of shareholders, will send an authorized representative
to the general business meeting in California. Join us!
But what if you've only got 40, 100 or 250 shares? You might think "Is it really worth the trouble?" In Germany: Transmitting shares to depots at other institutes isn't cheap, except for you are customer of one of the big direct brokers. But even if you've got a depot at your bank, please do not hesitate to fill out our survey! We will analyze information we get via the survey right away and you will get an email with further information! Some short explanations first: Of course we will cooperate with notaries and lawyers, we want full transparancy! All transactions will be annuled after the meeting and you will get your shares back. Privacy of your data is ensured (read below). In detail: If you are a customer of comdirekt, Commerzbank, Entrium,
Diraba, Consors or Maxblue/DB24, you should have your 'own' common depot,
together with other BeOS shareholders at the same institute. We are
still looking for BeOS users to administer common depots. Supports
get a receipt for their contribution. Important: Except for Diraba, the
transfer of shares between depots of the same institute usually is free
of cost!
In the U.S.: Go to the general business meeting or contact other BeOS-fans and Be Inc.-shareholders you know, one of you guys can go to the general business meeting and kick ass. But please inform us that you'll be there and you're on our side. We got to know if it makes any sense! Divided We FallEach small shareholder on his or her own has no say in the matter. Only if we stand united, we have a chance. Moreover, if you are not located in the US, you won't be invited to the general meeting, you can't deposit your papers there easily. And you sure won't just cross your respective ocean just to attend the 'funeral'.Help yourself! Help us! Help BeOS! Please fill out this form! Let's skip those petitions to Palm, let's fight for our own interests! All we want to talk with Palm about is the kind of Open Source model, nothing else! Time's short! If we don't succeed now, we will not have the chance for another fight! StatusBefore we formed this project, we already had contacts to numerous shareholders. Before we started this campaign! Time's short and there's some really tough work to do. But we can do it. Please: get in touch!OpenBeOS/Scarabeos - Kommitee Kontakt: Horst Ebenhöh
|